אמור ב

Okay, let's break down this Sicha (discourse) from the Rebbe. The goal is to understand the Rebbe's message step-by-step, making sure all the background and concepts are clear. **The Starting Point: A Question from the Torat Kohanim** 1. **The Verse:** The Sicha begins by quoting a verse from the Torah (Leviticus 23:34), which introduces the festival of Sukkot: "Speak to the Children of Israel, saying: On the fifteenth day of this seventh month is the Festival of Sukkot, seven days for Hashem (G-d)." This verse appears near the end of a section detailing the yearly festivals (Parshat HaMo'adot). 2. **The Ancient Question (Torat Kohanim):** The Rebbe then brings an ancient commentary called the *Torat Kohanim* (also known as *Sifra*, it's a collection of Midrash Halacha – legal and interpretive explanations – on the book of Leviticus, dating back to the Mishnaic period). The Torat Kohanim asks: Why does the Torah need to state this verse? * It explains its own question: Later in the same chapter (Leviticus 23:42), the Torah commands, "In Sukkot (booths) you shall dwell seven days." But just reading *that* verse alone, we wouldn't know *which* seven days. Does it mean the first seven days of the festival starting on the 15th of the month, or perhaps a different seven-day period *after* the main festival concludes? * The Torat Kohanim answers: *That's* why the *earlier* verse (the one the Rebbe quoted first) says, "On the fifteenth day of this seventh month is the **Festival of Sukkot**, seven days for Hashem." By calling the festival "Chag **HaSukkot**" (Festival **of Booths**) right at the start, the Torah links the *name* (and thus the core activity) of dwelling in Sukkot specifically to the seven days beginning on the 15th. This clarifies that the command "In Sukkot you shall dwell" refers to these first seven days, not some later period. 3. **Commentators' Understanding (Clarified by the Rebbe in brackets):** The Rebbe adds a clarification based on how commentators understand the Torat Kohanim's question. They see the question slightly differently: Why does the *first* verse call the holiday "Chag **HaSukkot**" right away? At this point in the text, the Torah only mentions the date, the prohibition of work ("sacred convocation, you shall not do any laborious work"), and the holiday sacrifices. The actual commandment to *dwell in a Sukkah* comes much later in the chapter. Logically, shouldn't the first verse just say "A festival of seven days..." without mentioning "Sukkot" yet? * The Torat Kohanim's answer, according to this view, remains the same: The name "Sukkot" is used early on *precisely* to establish the timing – to make it clear that the later command "dwell in Sukkot" applies to *these* seven days starting on the 15th. **The Problem: A Superficial Connection?** 1. **Initial Implication:** The Rebbe points out that if we take the Torat Kohanim's explanation at face value, it seems like the mitzvah (commandment) of dwelling in the Sukkah ("B'Sukkot Teshvu") isn't intrinsically connected to the *essence* of the holiday itself. The other core elements mentioned earlier – the Yom Tov (festival) status, the work prohibition, the sacrifices, and even the mitzvah of the Four Species (Lulav, Etrog, etc., mentioned later but linked to the holiday's joy) – seem separate. The name "Chag HaSukkot" in the first verse, according to this simple reading, merely serves as a timing instruction for the Sukkah dwelling, telling us *when* it happens, but not necessarily that it's the *heart* of the festival. 2. **The Rebbe's Objection:** The Rebbe argues this interpretation is insufficient. The very fact that the Torah uses the *name* "Chag HaSukkot" to define the timing implies a deeper connection. In Jewish thought, a name isn't just a label; it reflects the inner essence or defining characteristic of the thing named. If the holiday is called "Festival **of Sukkot**," then the Sukkah must be central to the holiday's identity and meaning, not just an activity scheduled for that week. * **Even stronger:** Since this is the *name* of the holiday, it must express the fundamental *content and theme* of the entire festival. **The Rebbe's Questions** If the Sukkah is indeed the core essence of the holiday, the Rebbe asks, then why does the structure of the Torah text seem to contradict this? * **Question A:** When the Torah finally *does* give the command "In Sukkot you shall dwell seven days," why doesn't that verse explicitly connect it back to the festival days mentioned earlier? For example, why doesn't it say "In Sukkot you shall dwell *during the* seven days [we just discussed]"? The lack of such a link seems strange if the Sukkah is the central theme. * **Question B:** Why isn't the command "Seven days you shall dwell in Sukkot" placed *immediately* after the holiday is named "Chag HaSukkot" at the beginning of the section? The Rebbe contrasts this with the festival of Pesach (Passover). The Torah calls it "Chag HaMatzot" (Festival of Unleavened Bread) and *immediately* follows with the command, "Seven days you shall eat Matzot" (Leviticus 23:6). Why the different structure for Sukkot? If Sukkah is the essence, shouldn't the command appear right away, just like Matzah for Pesach? **Introducing a Related Concept: Taking the Lulav in the Sukkah** To answer these questions, the Rebbe introduces a related discussion from Jewish law (Halacha): 1. **The Alter Rebbe's Ruling:** Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, the founder of Chabad Chassidism (known as the Alter Rebbe), writes in his Siddur (prayer book, which also contains laws and Chassidic insights) that taking the Lulav (the Four Species) *while inside the Sukkah* is a "Mitzvah min HaMuvchar." This phrase means it's the *choicest* or most ideal way to perform the mitzvah. 2. **Source: Halacha or Kabbalah?** The Rebbe notes that this idea is often traced to Kabbalistic sources, specifically the teachings of the Arizal (Rabbi Isaac Luria, a seminal Kabbalist). However, the Rebbe suggests that, like all concepts in the inner dimensions of Torah (Kabbalah and Chassidus), it must also have a basis and explanation within the revealed, legal dimension of Torah (Nigleh, or Halacha). * **Supporting this:** The Alter Rebbe's specific phrasing, "Mitzvah min HaMuvchar," sounds like a precise Halachic category, suggesting an enhancement of the mitzvah itself, rather than just mystical advice (like the Arizal's "It is good to bless..." formulation). **Why is Taking Lulav in the Sukkah Preferred? Two Possibilities** The Rebbe explores *why* performing the Lulav mitzvah inside the Sukkah might be considered "Mitzvah min HaMuvchar": 1. **Possibility 1 (Focus on the Sukkah):** Perhaps it relates to the fundamental rule of the Sukkah mitzvah: "Teshvu k'ein taduru" – "You shall dwell [in the Sukkah] as you normally live [in your home]." This means that ideally, all regular activities – eating, drinking, sleeping, relaxing, studying – should take place within the Sukkah for the seven days. Since taking the Lulav is a primary mitzvah performed during Sukkot, it naturally falls under the category of activities that should ideally be done inside the Sukkah as part of "dwelling" properly. Just like taking a walk should ideally be in the Sukkah, even more so should performing a mitzvah like Lulav. 2. **Rebbe's Objection to Possibility 1:** While logical, this explanation centers the benefit on fulfilling the *Sukkah* mitzvah better. However, the Alter Rebbe places this ruling within the laws of *Lulav* and says, "The mitzvah *of taking it* [the Lulav] *in the Sukkah* is Mitzvah min HaMuvchar." The emphasis is on enhancing the *Lulav* mitzvah itself, not just the Sukkah dwelling. 3. **Practical Difference (Nafka Mina):** The distinction matters in practice. What if it's raining? Jewish law states that if one is significantly uncomfortable in the Sukkah (e.g., due to rain), they are exempt ("Mitzta'er patur min haSukkah"). * If taking Lulav in the Sukkah is merely part of the ideal *Sukkah dwelling*, then if you're exempt from dwelling due to rain, there's no special reason to wait for the rain to stop just to take the Lulav inside the Sukkah. You'd take it wherever is convenient, just as you'd eat inside the house if it were raining heavily. * However, if taking Lulav in the Sukkah is an ideal way to fulfill the *Lulav* mitzvah itself, then even if you're exempt from *sitting* in the Sukkah due to rain, it would arguably be preferable ("min haMuvchar") to *wait* until the rain stops, if possible, so you can perform the Lulav mitzvah in the Sukkah, thereby fulfilling the *Lulav* mitzvah in its most complete and ideal form. **The Core Distinction: Pesach vs. Sukkot Revisited** The Rebbe now returns to the comparison between Pesach (Chag HaMatzot) and Sukkot (Chag HaSukkot) to build his main argument: 1. **Key Differences Recalled:** * **Naming Scope:** Pesach is called "Chag HaMatzot L'Hashem" (Festival of Matzot *to G-d*), perhaps implying the Matzah aspect isn't the *entirety* of the seven days' theme. Sukkot is called "Chag HaSukkot *shevat yamim* L'Hashem" (Festival of Sukkot *seven days* to G-d), explicitly linking the name to the full duration. * **Command Placement:** For Pesach, the command "eat Matzot" follows *immediately* after the name. For Sukkot, the command "dwell in Sukkot" is delayed until the end of the section. * **Common Usage:** Pesach is very often called "Pesach" (Passover) in Rabbinic texts and common parlance, indicating "Matzot" isn't its only identity. Sukkot is almost always called "Sukkot" or "Chag HaSukkot," suggesting this name *is* its core identity. 2. **The Rebbe's Conclusion from these Differences:** * For Pesach, the fact that it has another major name ("Pesach") and that the Torah immediately explains the "Matzot" name by commanding its consumption suggests that eating Matzah is *one specific reason* or aspect that gives the holiday this name, but it doesn't define the *entire essence* of the whole seven-day period. * For Sukkot, the consistent name and the delayed command suggest the opposite: "Sukkot" *is* the fundamental content and theme of the *entire* seven-day festival. 3. **Explaining the Structure:** *This* is why the textual structure is the way it is: * For Pesach, the Torah immediately says "eat Matzot" to clarify that *this specific practice* is why it's called "Chag HaMatzot," implying it's not the *only* defining feature of the holiday. * For Sukkot, the command "dwell in Sukkot" is *delayed* precisely because Sukkah *is* the essence of the whole holiday. If the command came immediately after the name "Chag HaSukkot," we might mistakenly think (like with Matzah) that dwelling in the Sukkah is just *one reason* for the name, rather than the defining characteristic that shapes the entire festival period. **The Source of Holiness: A Deeper Distinction** The Rebbe deepens the distinction between the two holidays by examining the *source* of their sanctity: 1. **Pesach's Holiness (Top-Down):** The 15th of Nissan (first day of Pesach) is inherently special primarily because it commemorates the Exodus from Egypt ("the day of your departure from the land of Egypt"). This historical event, orchestrated by G-d, imbues the *time itself* with holiness. The Torah says, "This day shall be for you a memorial, and you shall celebrate it as a festival to Hashem throughout your generations" (Exodus 12:14). The sanctity of the *day* comes first (from G-d's historical intervention), and *because* the day is holy, we perform specific mitzvot like eating Matzah. 2. **Sukkot's Holiness (Bottom-Up):** In contrast, the seven days starting on the 15th of Tishrei (the seventh month) do not commemorate a specific historical event that occurred *on those exact dates*. Their special status and holiness arise *from the mitzvah that we perform during them*: the commandment to dwell in Sukkot for seven days. It is the *act* of dwelling in the Sukkah, especially in the all-encompassing way prescribed ("Teshvu k'ein taduru," living one's life within it), that transforms these ordinary autumn days into a holy festival ("Chag L'Hashem"). * **Supporting Argument:** The Rebbe notes that while we mention the Exodus on all festivals (often saying "in remembrance of the Exodus from Egypt" in prayers), the connection differs. On Pesach, the remembrance is the *cause* of the festival day itself. On Sukkot, the Torah connects the Exodus to the *reason for the mitzvah* of Sukkah: "so that your generations may know that I made the Children of Israel dwell in Sukkot when I brought them out of the land of Egypt" (Leviticus 23:43). * Notice: This reason is given *after* the command to dwell in the Sukkah, not when the festival date is first introduced. * Furthermore, the historical dwelling in booths likely occurred starting in the spring (Nissan), not the fall (Tishrei). The Tur (Rabbi Yaakov ben Asher, a major medieval Halachic authority) points out that observing Sukkot specifically in the fall, when people normally move *indoors*, highlights that we do it purely because G-d commanded it, not just as a natural commemoration of the historical season. This reinforces the idea that our *current performance* of the mitzvah generates the holiday's sanctity. **Implications for the Holiday's Structure and Mitzvot** 1. **Sukkot's Unity:** Based on this "bottom-up" understanding, the other elements of Sukkot mentioned at the beginning of the section (sacred convocation, work prohibition, sacrifices) are not separate from the Sukkah mitzvah. They are integral parts of the "Chag HaSukkot," whose very definition and sanctity *derive from* the act of dwelling in the Sukkah. The holiness generated by the Sukkah observance permeates and defines these other aspects as well. 2. **Pesach's Components:** On Pesach, because the holiness stems from the day itself (Exodus), the various components (Yom Tov status, work prohibition, sacrifices) are connected to that inherent sanctity, somewhat independently of the specific mitzvah of eating Matzah. **Answering the Questions and Understanding Lulav in Sukkah** Now the Rebbe ties everything together: 1. **Why no explicit link in "B'Sukkot Teshvu"?** The command "In Sukkot you shall dwell seven days" doesn't need to explicitly say "in *those* festival days mentioned earlier" because the relationship is reversed. We aren't commanded to dwell in the Sukkah *because* they are festival days; rather, they *become* festival days *because* we are commanded to dwell in the Sukkah during them. The act of dwelling *creates* the festival context. 2. **Rashi on Shemini Atzeret:** The Rebbe brings a proof from Rashi (the primary commentator on the Torah and Talmud). The Talmud states that Shemini Atzeret (the festival immediately following the seven days of Sukkot) is a "separate festival" in certain respects. Rashi explains what this means practically: "We do not sit in the Sukkah." This simple explanation implies that the defining characteristic of the preceding festival (Sukkot) *was* the sitting in the Sukkah. The essence of the *Regel* (pilgrimage festival) of Sukkot is the act of dwelling in the Sukkah. 3. **Lulav's Connection:** The mitzvah of Lulav, however, *is* explicitly linked to the day: "You shall take for yourselves *on the first day*..." (Leviticus 23:40). The obligation arises *because* it is the first day of the festival whose sanctity is defined by the Sukkah. The holiday's holiness (generated by the Sukkah concept) mandates the taking of the Lulav. 4. **Lulav in Sukkah Explained (Revisited):** Since the Sukkah dwelling *establishes* the complete sanctity and definition of the holiday, and the Lulav mitzvah derives its obligation *from* that sanctity, performing the Lulav mitzvah *within the Sukkah* (the very source and environment of the holiday's generated holiness) brings the Lulav mitzvah to its highest potential. It's not just fulfilling the Sukkah's "dwelling" requirement; it enhances the *Lulav* mitzvah itself by grounding it in the context that gives rise to its obligation. This makes it "Mitzvah min HaMuvchar" for the *Lulav*. **The Inner, Spiritual Meaning (Pnimiyut Ha'Inyanim)** The Rebbe now explores the deeper, Chassidic significance of these ideas: 1. **The Advantage of "Bottom-Up" Holiness:** The fact that Sukkot's holiness is generated through our actions ("B'Sukkot Teshvu") gives it a unique spiritual advantage over Pesach's "top-down," inherent holiness. * When sanctity is drawn down into the world through human actions performed within the physical realm, it has a profound power to permeate and elevate the world itself, including aspects of time and space that might otherwise seem mundane or devoid of holiness. Holiness that is inherently "from above" might remain somewhat transcendent or separate from the ordinary. 2. **Reflected in the Mitzvot:** This difference is mirrored in the nature of the central mitzvot: * **Matzah:** Eating Matzah is a specific religious act. While essential, it's not something one typically does outside of the mitzvah context. It's an *act of* holiness. * **Sukkah:** The mitzvah is "Teshvu k'ein taduru" – dwelling *as you normally live*. Eating, sleeping, talking, relaxing – the mundane activities of life – *become* the mitzvah when performed in the Sukkah. The mitzvah elevates everyday existence itself, rather than being a separate holy act. 3. **The Unique Power of Sukkot:** Throughout the year, elevating mundane activities requires conscious effort and intention ("All your actions should be for the sake of Heaven," "In all your ways, know Him"). On Sukkot, the structure of the mitzvah itself achieves this transformation. Our everyday lives, conducted within the Sukkah, become intrinsically holy. * Physically, the Sukkah surrounds the entire person – head to foot, including clothes. This symbolizes how G-d's will, through the mitzvah, can encompass the totality of a person's being and activities. This all-encompassing nature is unique among mitzvot. **Applying the Lesson to Spiritual Pursuits (Lulav/Torah Study)** The Rebbe concludes by applying this profound idea specifically to the Alter Rebbe's emphasis on Lulav *in* the Sukkah: 1. **The Potential Misconception:** One might think that the Sukkah's embrace is primarily needed for our physical, mundane needs (eating, sleeping, etc.). Do our spiritual pursuits, symbolized by the Lulav (especially the date palm, which has "taste and fragrance" in some interpretations, or just "taste" representing Torah scholars), really need this external framework of the Sukkah? Aren't those engaged in Torah study already connected to G-d? * **Personal Application:** A person might think: "I understand why my eating and drinking need the Sukkah's sanctity. But my Torah learning? That's already inherently holy! I perform mitzvot like Sukkah because the Talmud says, 'Whoever says I have only Torah, does not even have Torah' [Yevamot 109b], meaning Torah must lead to action. But surely the *act* of learning itself doesn't need the Sukkah's 'embrace' in the same way?" Is the benefit of being in the Sukkah only related to fulfilling the Sukkah mitzvah, not intrinsic to the Lulav/Torah study itself? 2. **The Rebbe's Point (via Alter Rebbe):** No! The Alter Rebbe stresses it is "Mitzvah min HaMuvchar" *for the Lulav* (symbolizing Torah study and connection to G-d). This means even our highest spiritual endeavors are elevated by being performed within the Sukkah's context. 3. **The Deeper Meaning:** Taking the Lulav (representing Torah) *in the Sukkah* signifies approaching Torah study with the profound awareness that we are *encompassed* by G-d's Will (the Sukkah). It means recognizing that the Torah we grasp with our intellect is rooted in G-d's infinite, transcendent Wisdom, which is fundamentally "Makkif" – surrounding and beyond our comprehension. * This fosters **Bittul** (humility, self-nullification) and **Teshukah** (yearning, desire) – the understanding that we are receiving something infinitely greater than ourselves, and the deep desire to internalize even a spark of that Divine truth ("Torah which is hidden from the eyes of all living"). It transforms learning from mere intellectual acquisition into a receptive embrace of Divine Will. 4. **Broader Implication & Conclusion:** When a person approaches Torah not just as knowledge, but with love, reverence, and awe ("Chavivut v'yokar HaTorah"), recognizing its Divine source and purpose (symbolized by "blessing on the Torah first," which Rabbinic sources connect to appreciating its value), this prevents the spiritual emptiness described as the cause of past destruction ("Why was the Land lost? ... Because they abandoned My Torah... they did not bless it first" - Talmud Nedarim 81a, Bava Metzia 85a-b). * This attitude—recognizing that even our highest spiritual pursuits need to be enveloped by submission to G-d's Will (the Sukkah)—is the path to redemption. * The Rebbe concludes with a blessing that through this understanding and practice, we should merit the ultimate fulfillment: G-d spreading His "Sukkah of Peace" over us with the building of the Third Temple (referred to poetically as G-d's "Sukkah" in Jerusalem based on Psalms 76:3: "In Shalem [Jerusalem] was His Tabernacle [Sukko]") through the arrival of Moshiach (the Messiah), speedily in our days. **In Essence:** The Rebbe uses a textual difficulty about the placement of verses regarding Sukkot to explore the fundamental nature of the holiday. He shows that unlike Pesach, whose holiness stems from a past event, Sukkot's holiness is generated by our current actions, specifically the all-encompassing mitzvah of dwelling in the Sukkah. This "bottom-up" sanctity has the power to elevate all aspects of life, even the mundane. Applying this to the practice of taking the Lulav in the Sukkah, the Rebbe teaches that even our highest spiritual pursuits, like Torah study, reach their truest potential only when performed with humility and awe, recognizing they are enveloped within G-d's overarching Will—a state embodied by the Sukkah. This holistic integration of life under G-d's Will is the key to bringing the final Redemption.